• Coach
  • Deprogramming Christianity Workshop
  • Contact & Bio
Menu

Josh Gaines

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number

Your Custom Text Here

Josh Gaines

  • Coach
  • Deprogramming Christianity Workshop
  • Contact & Bio

"Child of God" by Cormac McCarthy - Book Review

January 27, 2016 Josh Gaines
photo from Amazon.com

photo from Amazon.com

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

My personal history with the work of Cormac McCarthy is limited and rather unbalanced. I have friends who praise his name up one way and down the other, though I had, until recently, never really understood the hype surrounding him. I read The Road several years back and did not care for it. I felt it was fairly straightforward as stories go and altogether less than fantastic. I watched the 2013 film The Counselor which he penned specifically for the screen and thought that while the movie was executed well from a filmmaking standpoint, it was a pointlessly bleak story and not a film worth revisiting.

On the other hand, I do very much enjoy the Coen’s adaptation of No Country for Old Men, though that is hardly the same thing as reading the novel so I can’t speak much to the story in its original form. More recently, I read McCarthy’s short novel Child of God, published in 1973, and finally caught a glimpse of that greatness of which my friends so fervently speak.

Child of God is a brutal novel, appealing to my love for gritty Southern literature, but it is also beautiful and eloquent with many rich descriptive passages and profound lines of dialogue. McCarthy’s tone in this book is like a pitch-perfect blending of Faulkner’s observant, human-centric prose and the depraved sinful conduct and bloodshed performed by the characters of Donald Ray Pollock or Daniel Woodrell.

There were numerous moments that were exceptionally hard to stomach while reading, though not because the violence was described gratuitously or at length, but simply for the nature of the violence (or sexual act) itself. The central character is utterly despicable, deranged beyond measure, and wholly impossible to admire in any fashion, yet somehow he is completely fascinating in a way that fills the reader with a sort of dumbstruck terror and holds their attention for almost 200 pages (at least, it held mine). Reading Child of God is like glimpsing a horrifying slice of reality we had never dreamt was possible but one that could very well exist in a not-so-distant corner of our own country.

McCarthy makes the minimalist approach work to his advantage (a style that is challenging to do well), both in the forming of his characters and in the building of the novel’s environment. The lack of specific detail about a character’s appearance or mannerisms allows the reader to formulate a sense of the person that comes almost exclusively from the way they speak or the actions they carry out (Steinbeck had a similar way of forming characters through dialogue). That said, McCarthy is able to be very descriptive when he wants to be and when the moment suits it, crafting lengthy and carefully-worded sentences that have to be read more than once to be fully appreciated for their scope (for example, the sentence that opens the novel).

The argument could be made as to “what’s the point?” of a novel like this in which a deplorable person does monstrous things to others and more or less gets away with it, enduring only meager repercussions to the end of his life. This is the sort of book that will rub certain people the wrong way, or which others will simply not “get.” I can’t say that I understand the point of the novel perfectly either (and am not suggesting that it needs to have one), but that, like so many things, it was quite an experience to walk through and I was ultimately glad to have read it, though “glad” is probably not quite the correct word. I came out the other end having had something small and subtle confirmed in my mind regarding the nature of man and his tendency towards wickedness.

-D.G.

 

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags cormac mccarthy, child of god, review, no country for old men, the counselor, blood meridian, coen, brothers, the road, pulitzer prize, all the pretty horses, daniel woodrell, frank bill, southern, fiction, lit, literature, gothic, dark, gritty, bloody, brutal, donald ray pollock, william faulkner, faulkner, james franco, south, southern gothic, deep south, writing, reading, 2016, books, novel, books 2016, the shot, doctor gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, hitching post, white bark, poisonous snakes of the midwest, the golden calf, pirate ghost of hole 19, muzzleland press, author, denver, colorado, cormac mccarthy child of god, child of god novel, child of god book review, child of god review, cormac mccarthy best books, cormac mccarthy book review
Comment

"The Goldfinch" by Donna Tartt - Book Review

January 22, 2016 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

Best to get the nasty stuff out of the way early: the first and most glaring issue with this book is that it could have been utterly fantastic if it were 30,000 - 50,000 words shorter. I’m not exaggerating.

Long books are fine; I’m fond of a number of literary tomes. Books that take their time to develop and unfold can be wonderful. But in the case of The Goldfinch, there are passages that needlessly go on for far too long once the reader has already gotten the picture (heh heh). One particular exchange of dialogue towards the end of the book is drawn out so long in an (ineffective) effort to build tension that it literally had me cursing out loud to just get on with the reveal already. Other sections were flamboyantly self-indulgent, and while they were well written, they were also wholly necessary and trying too hard to come across as reverential. There were some particular similes used that were so eye-rollingly corny and out of place that an editor with any sense would have promptly zapped them out of the text.

Now, all of that sounds rather harsh for a book that I actually think it is a triumph and one that I ultimately enjoyed quite a lot. This book is wonderful, it just could have benefited from some hearty editing, and it took about 150 pages to get interesting.

As to the author’s strengths, there is no question that Donna Tartt’s prose is capable of being uncannily eloquent at times. She writes these swirling, dreamy passages so full of heart and carefully detailed familiarity that one tends to be carried away on her words and forget that they are reading altogether. Also, her ability to write dialogue is impeccable; to say that her characters speak like real, living, breathing souls doesn’t aptly describe it. Her descriptions are lush with details and are such that she must be drawing from a deep well of personal experience, so diverse are the areas of life the novel touches upon.

The Goldfinch has a curious flow about it, since the plot goes through a series of patterns that circle back around on each other, blooming and changing each time they recur like a massive kaleidoscope of events. And while the book only spans a period of somewhere around eighteen years and the narrator is still a young man by the end, there is this inherent sense of a great deal of time passing, as if the reader is watching someone’s life unfold from beginning to end with all the vivid, minute characteristics of everyday life. Believe it or not, that isn’t another jab to the length of the book—I’m saying it’s one of the novel’s strengths.

Boris, the main character’s unpredictable but endlessly loyal best friend, has earned a place in my favorite characters of literature. He was hilarious with an exuberant personality, a lover of life, not entirely safe and yet dumbfoundingly lucky. He enters the story roughly one-third of the way in, and it was at this point that I thought the book really came into its own. Boris contributed substantially to my sticking with the novel.

The main character himself, Theodore Decker, begins as a less than confident young man for whom the reader quickly feels some degree of sympathy because of the unavoidable tragedy that befalls him. The simplest way to describe the situation in which he finds himself in is crude: it just… absolutely sucks, and you can’t help but feel troubled for him. As the novel unfolds, the reader observes as Theo grows and becomes a man, changing all the while, though in many ways not for the better.

There is a great deal of alcohol and substance use (and abuse) throughout the book, though I found this to be more interesting than tragic; the odd, wide-eyed fascination of watching someone else continue to harm themselves and make poor decisions with horrific consequences. The drugs and booze are certainly presented in a negative, destructive light.

The Goldfinch concludes with a lengthy, larger-than-life speech from the narrator that attempts to somehow sum up the varied and complicated events that took place before it, though it rang a bit heavy-handed to my ears. As a writer, I can relate to the desire to want to give your readers some epic, all-encompassing, cosmic monologue that takes into account space, time, God, love, life, death, and every created thing (which is what I felt this speech was trying to do), but it did not quite work for me for two reasons: 1. the book was strong enough already without it, and 2. this book really cannot be summed up in a few pages. That said, I suppose I do not have any real room to criticize because I have no damn idea how a novel of this scope and length could have been ended in any way that would be perceived as “just right.”

The Goldfinch is a one of those reads that only comes around every decade or so. Unfortunately, it is also the sort of novel that attracts the booky-snobs, but who pays attention to them anyway? This book is lovely and powerful, but it is also an undertaking. Read it if you’re okay with stories being slow and taking their time. Read it if you’re okay with your main characters drinking a lot of alcohol and doing a lot of coke and heroin. Read it if you enjoy Russian culture. Read it if you’re really into art or antique furniture. And read it if you’re a writer; you’ll come out the other end with your mind expanded and a few new tricks in your bag.

-D.G.

In Writing, Book Reviews Tags the goldfinch, book review, review, book, novel, donna tartt, the little friend, the secret history, theo, theodore decker, boris, character, alcohol, drinking, abuse, heroin, cocaine, coke, drug, books 2016, 2016, reading, reading 2016, carel, fabritius, painting, art, history, russia, russian, amsterdam, theme, literature, literary, pulitzer, prize, winner, author, writer, doctor gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, gaines, michigan ten cents, claras quilt, hitching post, white bark, THE SHOT, pirate ghost of hole 19, muzzleland press, poisonous snakes of the midwest, the golden calf, colorado, denver, the goldfinch review, the goldfinch book review, donna tartt the goldfinch, the goldfinch donna tartt, the goldfinch donna tartt review, the goldfinch donna tartt book review, goldfinch author, goldfinch writer, who wrote the goldfinch, donna tartt best book
Comment

2015: A REVIEW IN BOOKS

January 4, 2016 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

  1. Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn - 10/10 (To me, this book was a flawless thriller. It blew me away numerous times, and the conclusion was crushing. Even though it's become a pop-lit sensation, it has more depth than one might expect)

  2. The Fountainhead, Ayn Rand - 8/10 (Howard Roark is a character like none other I've ever encountered in literature. What a book. Would have called it a perfect "10" if it hadn't dragged so much in the last third)

  3. Surprised by Joy, C.S. Lewis - 7/10 (second time reading this. Wonderful, inspiring, uplifting)

  4. Broken Monsters, Lauren Beukes  - 7/10 (Great premise with some incredibly creative moments, but a very misguided and meandering book that lacked fluidity in its blending of genres)

  5. I Am Legend, Richard Matheson - 8/10 (Unbelievably strong writing. Matheson's ideas were ages ahead of his time)

  6. Live and Let Die, Ian Fleming - 7/10 (My first Bond book. A quick, entertaining little read)

  7. Revival, Stephen King - 6/10 (Not one of his best. Strangely paced and with an ending that felt a bit out of left field, but it had some good moments, primarily the music-related passages)

  8. Gateways to Abomination, Matthew M. Bartlett - 8/10 (the face of new horror. This man is trailblazing into insane territory, and it's brain-melting)

  9. The Sound and the Fury, William Faulkner - 8/10 (Challenging, but excellent)

  10. Duma Key, Stephen King - 9/10 (Possibly my favorite King novel since Lisey's Story. Diverse, character-rich, artful, bizarre)

  11. Flight of the Blue Falcon, Jonathan Raab - 7/10

  12. The Martian, Andy Weir - 6/10 (A rare case where the movie was better than the book. Weir's writing is primarily a series of technical [but interesting] expositions, while the movie has a fleshed-out cast of diverse and developed characters)

  13. Finders Keepers, Stephen King - 9/10 (Second book in the Bill Hodges trilogy. Leans a bit too heavily on coincidence, but I still really had fun with this one)

  14. The JAWS Log, Carl Gottlieb - 7/10 (The backstory to the production of one of the greatest films of our time. Fascinating)

  15. As I Lay Dying, William Faulkner - 9/10 (Overall more accessible than The Sound and the Fury. A strong and heartbreaking gem)

  16. In the Woods, Tana French - 10/10 (A masterful mystery with incredible depth and realistic characters. French was my favorite new author [new to me, that is] discovery this year)

  17. The Likeness, Tana French - 8/10 (A premise that is intriguing but a bit of a stretch riding on the heels of In the Woods. Still, her voice is strong enough that the story was solid)

  18. The Pursuit of God, A.W. Tozer - 10/10

  19. Lunar Park, Bret Easton Ellis - 8/10 (This has become my favorite B.E.E. work. A meticulously crafted piece of curious meta-horror)

  20. Rose Madder, Stephen King - 5/10 (I almost couldn't finish this one. His weakest book, save The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon)

  21. The Pleasure Merchant, Molly Tanzer - 3/10 (Well written, but not my cup of tea)

  22. Donnybrook, Frank Bill - 6/10 (Had its moments, but mostly a series of gruesome actions being done by characters who are too similar to each other to be told apart)

  23. Twelve Ordinary Men, John MacArthur - 4/10

  24. The Familiar, Volume 1: One Rainy Day in May, Mark Z. Danielewski - 8/10 (I almost didn't begin this 27-volume series because it sounded too daunting/pretentious, but holy shit... am I glad I did. Like nothing else I've ever read; endlessly creative, full of mystery but with just enough clues and breadcrumbs to keep the reader going. Like LOST in some ways, but better)

  25. The Familiar, Volume 2: Into the Forest, Mark Z. Danielewski - 8/10 (Vol. 1 was the introduction; Vol. 2 kicks it into high gear. Cannot wait for Vols. 3 and 4 this year)

  26. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, J.R.R. Tolkien - 9/10 (HOW/WHY did I wait so long to read this series?!? What an experience it must have been for those who read them before the films... Should have done that)

UNFINISHED or IN PROGRESS:

  • Firestarter, Stephen King - Lost interest, or perhaps it just wasn't the right time. This is the first time I've started a King novel and not finished it. Will probably pick it up again at some point.

  • Catch-22, Joseph Heller - Stopped after 120 pages because it was stupid, pointless, and I have no clue as to how or why it became a bestseller. I'm not the target audience, apparently.

  • Mystery & Manners: Occasional Prose, Flannery O'Connor - This is a wonderful collection of lectures and essays that I don't so much read straight through as pick up from time to time throughout the year and read an individual piece or two. I would highly recommend to authors or creatives in general, I've found it hugely inspiring and insightful.

  • The Goldfinch, Donna Tartt - Began the audiobook for this one late in the year and am still making my way through it. Enjoying it, it's just 900 hours long.

  • The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, J.R.R. Tolkien - Currently reading. Where Fellowship took a while to get moving, this one starts with a bang and has been thrilling from the start.

  • The Brothers Karamazov, Fyodor Dostoevsky - Currently reading as part of a newly-joined book club. Several years back I wasn't able to make it through Crime and Punishment so we'll see how this goes...

  • Stories NOT for the Nervous, Alfred Hitchcock (editor, [except he wasn't]), Various Authors - This is a pocket paperback from 1965 of macabre stories from various authors, supposedly compiled or selected by Alfred Hitchcock. The "editor" title on the book is misleading, however, because I found out that Hitchcock himself was not an editor and had nothing whatsoever to do with the choosing of the stories in the collection, he merely cashed a check for allowing the publisher to put his name on a series of books containing spooky stories because they'd sell (A LOT) more copies that way. Though the collection was enjoyable, this piece of information somewhat killed it for me. Well played, Alfie--not.

 

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags gone girl, gillian flynn, the fountainhead, ayn rand, surprised by joy, cs lewis, broken monsters, lauren beukes, i am legend, richard matheson, live and let die, james bond, 007, ian fleming, revival, stephen king, gateways to abomination, matthew m bartlett, the sound and the fury, as i lay dying, william faulkner, flight of the blue falcon, jonathan raab, muzzleland press, duma key, the martian, finders keepers, jaws, the jaws log, in the woods, the likeness, tana french, andy weir, carl gottlieb, aw tozer, pursuit of god, lunar park, bret easton ellis, rose madder, molly tanzer, the pleasure merchant, donnybrook, frank bill, the familiar, volume 2, volume 1, one rainy day in may, into the forest, the lord of the rings, the fellowship of the ring, the two towers, jrr tolkien, the hobbit, firestarter, catch 22, mystery and manners, flannery oconnor, the goldfinch, stories not for the nervous, the brothers karamazov, review, books 2015, reading 2015, 2015, writing, writer, author, doctor gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, THE SHOT, hitching post, white bark, poisonous snakes of the midwest, pirate ghost of hole 19, blacktop city, best books of 2015, best books 2015, 2015 book review, 2015 book list, top books 2015, bestsellers 2015, booklist 2015
Comment

"The Familiar" Volume 2: Into the Forest by Mark Z. Danielewski - Book Review

December 2, 2015 Josh Gaines
Image from WFDD.org

Image from WFDD.org

This post includes affiliate links that support small businesses (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

It is difficult to know just how to properly review this second volume in Danielewski’s massive series-in-progress. It is so inseparably tied to the first book that to describe the plot that is forming would take far too long and, more importantly, would give too much away. Plus, there are parts of the story that have thus far been presented in such a minimalistic and abstract fashion that I’m not exactly sure what is going on yet, though I have confidence these things will be revealed over time. I’ve learned from experience that Danielewski may set up a lot of mysteries for his readers, but he also always pays them off eventually.

    I can say that after finishing Into the Forest, I am more excited than ever for this series to keep going. As other reviewers have said, stepping into Volume 2 is much easier because the reader has already tackled the hurdle of understanding the structure and flow of the books by reading Volume 1. With that obstacle out of the way, it frees up the reader to move through the story more quickly and naturally, keeping out a keen eye for clues and hints that the author may be leaving for us.

    If Volume 1 introduced us to the gigantic mythos Danielewski is building, Volume 2 cracked it open that much wider and revealed that things are only going to get more trippy from here. We’ve also been shown a little more of the pure enormity of scale that this series is going to encompass (paranormal or multi-dimensional creatures? Possible computer-simulated lives?? A young girl who is coming untethered from our world and crossing over into another one??? These aren't spoilers because they're only my best guesses and may be wholly incorrect). I confess, my limited brain could imagine perhaps another seven or eight volumes finishing out this story (judging by the arc it has taken so far), but to think that the author has another twenty-five volumes in store for us is mind-blowing, and I cannot wait to see what he’s come up with.

    But Volume 2 is not just better because it’s weirder, more violent, and goes into new territory with the creative formatting. It also delved deeper into the hearts of the characters, which I think is key with a story of this size. It would be one thing for the author to make a massive series that had crazy formatting with strange convoluted text and images just to be pretentious or “for the sake of art,” but Danielewski has shown us yet again that he is also a good writer who can tell a good story and craft lifelike characters. The Familiar would not get very far if we didn’t care about at least some of the people at the heart of the tale. And I do.

    I guess that’s about all I can say. If you liked Volume 1, you pretty much cannot go wrong with Volume 2. I think it will solidify your faith in the series that much more, and you’ll be patiently waiting with the rest of us to get your hands on Volume 3. If you are somehow reading this without even having read Volume 1 of The Familiar, get it into your life right now. It will undoubtedly be one of the most unique reading experiences you are likely to have.

-D.G.

In Writing, Book Reviews Tags the familiar, volume 2, review, into the forest, one rainy day in may, honeysuckle and pain, mark z danielewski, mark danielewski, mzd, reddit, house of leaves, the fifty year sword, only revolutions, xanther, anwar, astair, cat, formatting, novel, pantheon, 880 pages, twenty seven, 27, volumes, volume 1, volume 3, author, writer, story, danielewski, bret easton ellis, trippy, weird, bizarre, creative, doctor gaines, dr gaines, gaines, josh gaines, denver, colorado, the shot, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, hitching post, white bark, pirate ghost of hole 19, poisonous snakes of the midwest, vinyl me please, muzzleland press, the familiar mark danielewski, the familiar book 3 review, the familiar book two, the familiar book 2, into the forest review, into the forest book review, the familiar mark z danielewski, the familiar book review
Comment

"The Familiar" Volume 1: One Rainy Day in May by Mark Z. Danielewski - Book Review

November 10, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support small businesses (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

As you may already know, The Familiar is not a book/series that lends itself easily to review. Instead of trying to summarize the complicated and many-faceted plot, I will rather share a few thoughts on the experience of getting through Volume 1.

To be honest, when I first read the announcement about this series something like five years ago, my initial thought was, “That sounds pretentious and exhausting.” I had already read Danielewski’s House of Leaves at the time and enjoyed it quite a lot (challenging though it was), but a story that was projected to be 27-volumes long about a girl and her cat(??) sounded like too much.

However, after having recently heard Mark Z. Danielewski interviewed on Bret Easton Ellis’ podcast in promotion of Volume 2 of The Familiar, my interest was piqued. Danielewski was completely down to earth in the interview and his personality seemed the farthest thing from pretentious. His fervor and passion in talking about the project was too intriguing to ignore.

How wrong I was in my initial assessment!

This past week, I flew through Volume 1; I could not put it down. And yes, it was challenging at times and required an extra layer of careful attention that many books do not demand, but there was enough intrigue and mystery happening to keep me wanting more and moving forward. And I discovered quickly that that was the key: moving forward. Similar to the works of William Faulkner or James Joyce, it is best not to get too caught up in the moments that are unclear or confusing and push onward, because eventually those threads will begin to come together and your questions will be answered. If you try to read into every little clue and image or theorize about where the plot is headed in the middle of the book, you’ll drive yourself insane. Keep going, the story does pay off. Also, this being only the first of many volumes, the author isn’t going to reveal all of his tricks at once.

There was something enticing even in the physical act of turning pages at a fairly rapid pace, as many of the fonts are large or some pages have nothing more than a single sentence or word. Although the page count is 880, the word count adds up to something closer to a 250- or 300- page novel, and a quick-moving one at that. There was a wonderful balance of uncertainty and payoff, as well as weirdness and warmth. There are some enormous head-scratchers and curious elements throughout the book that may not be explained until many volumes down the line, but Danielewski isn’t just trolling us with a series that is bizarre and difficult for the sake of bizarre and difficult. There is a very clear story going on here with vivid, beautiful, and heart-engaging characters, particularly the family unit of Xanther (the teenage girl who rescues the cat), her mother Astair and her stepfather Anwar. Certain other characters only drop in very briefly and their passages are abstract and difficult to discern, but then again, we’ve only just met them, and surely their roles in this overarching tale will be revealed in time.

While reading the book I got a frequent sense of its bigness, and I don’t just mean page length or knowing how many more books there are to come. The story itself is something like a small peek into a vast universe; there is a strong sensation of much, much more lying just “beyond the curtain” of this world. The Familiar blends and transcends space, time, countries, races, species, technology, humanity, spirituality, and is meta and self-referential even in its structure as a novel. From front to back cover, not a single page is wasted, for even the pre- and post-story content is artful and intentional, offering more clues into the universe Danielewski is unveiling for us. The book is more to be experienced than read, and it is so visual and presentational in nature that it could be likened in many ways to a feature film. Lucky for us, this is only the first act.

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags mark z danielewski, mark danielewski, z, zampano, house of leaves, the familiar, review, volume 1, volume one, volume 2, volume 3, one rainy day in may, into the woods, honeysuckle and pain, danielewski, bret easton ellis, podcast, familiar, cat, cats, jingjing, xanther, ibrahim, anwar, astair, isandorno, 880, 27, twenty seven, volume, meta, space, time, transcend, author, writer, read, reading 2015, may 10 2014, may 11 2014, pantheon, books, books 2015, colorado, denver, michigan ten cents, claras quilt, doctor gaines, dr gaines, the shot, hitching post, pirate ghost of hole 19, white bark, poisonous snakes of the midwest, into the forest, the familiar mark danielewski, the familiar mark z danielewski, the familiar volume one, the familiar book one, the familiar volume 1, one rainy day in may review, one rainy day in may book review, mark z danielewski best book, mark z danielewski book review
Comment

SOMETHING BROKE IN ME: Thoughts & Experiences Surrounding Derek Cianfrance's "THE PLACE BEYOND THE PINES"

November 4, 2015 Josh Gaines

Let’s get something out of the way first: I am not much of a crier.

It is not that I have some male chauvinist tough guy complex about not ever letting myself cry, but rather that things in life--be it movies, books, music, experiences, things that are supposed to be sad or emotionally compelling, etc.--simply do not bring me to tears very often. I have a dead, stone-like heart, perhaps, or a broken part of my brain that simply does not activate that inherent human emotion that says: It is time to cry now.

That said, let’s begin.

*

“The Place Beyond the Pines is a movie about fathers and sons,” a friend had told me one morning over coffee at a small Denver roastery on South Broadway Street near my home, “and you should watch it. I don’t want to say much more than that, but… just watch it. It gives you a lot to think about.”

This was March 2014. We had spent a bright weekend morning discussing movies and various other things. Among them, Wes Anderson’s The Grand Budapest Hotel which had just come out, and The Conjuring (both of which my friend recommended, for I had not seen either at the time), as well as Akira and The Shining (which I urged him to see). We talked about books, got refills of coffee, talked some more, then said our goodbyes and went our separate ways to get on with the rest of the weekend.

Jump to two weeks later. It was a rainy, overcast Saturday afternoon. I was settled comfortably onto my purple IKEA couch--which, damn it all, looked undeniably grey, not purple, when my wife and I picked it out in the IKEA showroom some weeks earlier--with a Sierra Nevada IPA in hand and a copy of The Place Beyond the Pines in the BluRay player. I had put a copy on hold at the library, as had a number of other folks, apparently, because there was a two week wait on availability. My wife, eight months pregnant at the time, was out--it’s true--photographing a wedding, even with a sizable baby-belly swelling out from her middle. I specifically waited until I could watch Pines on my own because I knew from reading a short synopsis that it would probably be too much of a “downer” for her to enjoy.

The film began and I was struck by the quiet intensity of the opening scene. Luke Glanton (Ryan Gosling), shirtless, covered in black and green tattoos, skin shining with sweat, breathing heavily and pacing back and forth in a small room while flipping a butterfly knife open and closed, hyping himself up. Cut to a lengthy one-shot that remains fixed on the back of Luke’s head as he, now clad in a red leather jacket, weaves through the colorful pandemonium of a carnival surrounding him. He arrives at a red and white big top tent where inside an announcer is shouting his name to wild cheers from a crowd as he approaches a dirtbike, already running and chugging with anticipatory life. From the first moment I was intrigued by this character but also got the immediate sense that something about him was very unsafe.

The film progressed and I was fully enveloped in its first act; a quickly-paced back and forth narrative of aggressive heist scenes blended with the mellow, somewhat tragic personal life of Luke Glanton, his illegitimate infant son, and the woman Romina (Eva Mendes) with whom he has a complicated bond.

Aside from this first third of the movie being wonderful all its own (if painful to watch), I enjoyed the added luxury of knowing absolutely nothing about the film prior to seeing it, save for the ambiguous recommendation of my friend. Thus, I was jarred (and delighted) upon discovering, slowly and subtly, that this movie was something wholly other than what I had been expecting. The way in which the plot unfolds has an amorphous and deceptive quality (in a good way), leaving the viewer walking away from a film that feels very different from the one that they stepped into, even though the story itself remains fluid and intact.

To describe this any further would be to ruin the pleasures lying hidden within Pines that the person seeing it for the first time ought to have the privilege of discovering for themselves. While it does not contain the hard-hitting, jolt-to-the-system twists like that of Gone Girl or The Usual Suspects, that is not to say it is a film without surprises.

Derek Cianfrance is a master of quietness and subtlety who seems to have a fondness for exploring characters with regular, less-than-fantastic lives. In regards to the quietness: there are long segments in Pines without a soundtrack, or with music mixed so softly it serves only as a delicate undertone to the action on the screen, providing the performers enough vulnerable space in which to glow. As to the subtlety: Cianfrance’s characters often tend to be melancholy in such a way that even they do not realize they are melancholy, however to the viewer it is abundantly clear. They are not pathetic per se, and yet there are parts of their lives that make us cringe. Perhaps they are not openly depressed, and yet there is an undeniable sadness intertwined in their person. These are people whose lives appear to be just a little bit worse than our own; utterly, exhaustingly regular.

*

It was during one of these “regular” moments in The Place Beyond the Pines that I experienced one of the most jarring emotional incidents of my adult life.

The second act of the film began and I was being introduced to Officer Avery Cross, Bradley Cooper’s character, who had just been injured in a shootout with Luke Glanton. He was being legally coached at the hospital by his superiors into changing his story regarding the altercation, saying Glanton had shot first, even though Avery knew that was not the truth. What begins as Avery being in possible legal trouble flips instead to him becoming a hero among the local police force; one of “the good guys” injured in the line of duty. Avery’s discomfort with being heralded is visible on his face in the scenes following. He is sorely aware of his dishonesty, yet he never discourages the praise being poured out on him, nor pipes up to confess the truth about what happened. I could not help but feel a sort of misguided sympathy towards him for the tricky situation in which he had been placed, and found myself wondering what choices I would have made given the same scenario.

Back at home, Avery’s wife had recently given birth to their first child, a son. A scene opens in which nothing special is happening. Avery and his wife settle down on the couch with their newborn in a small, cozy-looking home to watch television (a news program singing more praises to Avery Cross’ heroism). It is not a crucial scene in the film, and its inclusion serves only two basic purposes: to give us a small peek into Avery’s new life as a father, and to remind us via the TV program that he is still a local celebrity.

And yet something caught in my throat.

That will be my life soon passed through my head in a whisper.

The inconsequential elements on-screen added up to something strange and overwhelming: that humble disheveled look of the Cross family’s living room, in need of picking up but neglected because that’s what new parents do. That warm simplicity of a family’s quiet evening at home together. That delicate infant boy in his clean onesie, pure white.

Suddenly I’m weeping. It started small, a few streams down the cheeks that took me completely by surprise. I had a fleeting thought that I was being ridiculous because this was hardly the sort of scene to be crying at, but the tears kept coming. And growing.

Remember that my wife was eight months pregnant at this time, so the looming certainty of having a child (and becoming a father) was hovering over my thoughts constantly, whether up front or in my deep subconscious. Knowing that there would be a baby in my home in roughly a month’s time was a bizarre and emotionally-loaded sensation. Fear, joy, excitement, uncertainty, feelings of inadequacy, questions as to whether making the decision to have a child was a mistake, and a million other things all rolled into one. Sitting there crying on the couch, I realized more fully than ever that there was going to be a little person whom I had never met before living with my wife and I very soon; an actual human with a heart and a personality and a face; a tangible thing of flesh and blood to hold and nurture. Seeing that quiet little family at home together on the couch opened something up inside me that I had never known was there.

This may sound made up, but my weeping got to the point that I had to pause the movie and go into the bathroom for tissues. I remember thinking in some distant part of my brain What in the world am I doing? and Where is this coming from? even though I knew the answer to that. I stood in my bathroom and continued to cry until I was hunched over, wet tissues bunched in my hand and my arms crossed over my stomach. My shoulders trembled as the waves of emotion washed over me, and I just let them keep coming until they were finished. I was not sad, nor was I necessarily happy, but I can say that what was happening felt cathartic and wonderful, like a great release after being closed up and under pressure for far too long. It felt like something secret and beautiful and true had blindsided me from the most unexpected of places. And while to this day I don’t understand exactly what happened that rainy afternoon, I do believe it was necessary and, in a way, a gift.

The tears finally stopped and I splashed some water on my face, then went back to the living room to finish the movie. I was in something like a euphoric state for the rest of the film, and damn if that Sierra Nevada wasn’t the best thing I had ever tasted.

*

My friend was right, The Place Beyond the Pines is a movie about fathers and sons, but it is also a movie about parents and children. I watched it a second time a few months ago (with my wife this time, and she liked it just fine) and my perspective was wholly different after having had a child. The scene I described earlier did not bring me to tears during this second viewing--that was a moment of inexplicable magic which I would be foolish to expect twice--however it did conjure a sweet memory of that strange tumultuous experience I had enjoyed (yes, enjoyed) a year and a half earlier.

I said at the start that I was not a crier, but that is not quite an accurate statement anymore. It would be more honest to say that I did not used be a crier. Since our child was born in April of 2014, a girl, I’ve cried plenty, and it’s wonderful. Sometimes those tears are out of sheer exhaustion, yes, but mostly they have been borne of laughter and joy that goes far beyond myself.

The Place Beyond the Pines is not my favorite film, but it is one with which I will always share a unique bond, for something unutterable and lovely broke open in me the first time I watched it. If that rainy afternoon served as a foreshadowing to something beautiful, the birth of my daughter was undoubtedly that beauty brought to fruition.

-D.G.

 

In Film, Writing Tags the place beyond the pines, derek cianfrance, blue valentine, film, review, analysis, experience, thinkpiece, emotion, daughter, son, father, children, sierra nevada ipa, movie, afternoon, bluray, thoughts, brother tied, light between oceans, cry, weep, bright wall dark, bwdr, bright wall dark room, essay
Comment

"Rose Madder" Book Review - Stephen King

October 9, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

I have read thirty-seven of Stephen King's books at this point in my life, and never have I struggled so much with not wanting to finish one, nor has finishing one taken me such a long period of time as with Rose Madder. I cannot place my finger on exactly why I felt this book dragged on and on, taking almost two months for me to get through it, as I would set it down for weeks at a time and have almost no interest in picking it back up save for a desire to see if it got better and to know what happened in the end. King has had a few duds over the years (I didn't care much for The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon and Blaze probably would have been just as well left unpublished. Roadwork was simply not that interesting) as would any author with a catalog as large as his, but there is at least some redeeming quality in all of his works—that inexplicable King-ness—that keeps myself and millions of other readers coming back to him time and again.

That King-ness was present in Rose Madder as well, and to be clear, I'm not calling this novel a dud, per se. The opening chapter is heart-wrenching and immediately engaging on an emotional level. We are introduced with striking clarity to the victimized Rose Daniels and her psychotic husband Norman (whose craziness and violence rivals only Beverly Marsh's husband Tom Rogan in IT). In the book's opening scene, Rose is beaten so badly that she loses the child with which she was pregnant, yet stays with her husband for a number of torturous years. She finally decides to leave him (not a spoiler) and free herself from his abuse and manipulation to find a new life on her own.

What follows is a tedious recounting of Rose moving to a new city, finding a place to stay as well as an unexpected job, making some new friends, discovering a love interest, etc. And while we care about Rose's well-being through all of this, there was a dawning realization as the book went on that, for lack of a better phrase, nothing else was going to happen. What I mean is, until about halfway through the book when some bizarre things finally start coming into play, I thought King had written a “straight” melodramatic novel about a troubled wife leaving her monstrous husband. It would have been completely fine if that is what the book ended up being, I'm just saying it gave the whole story an imbalanced feeling when it took so many pages to get to “the point.” I thought many times over that this could have been a great novella, a nice tight hundred page story as opposed to a three hundred plus page hardback with heaps of filler material.

While some of the weird stuff later on was cool and fun to read (a maze with a Centaur, a magical image-shifting painting, a woman in a blood red robe who is very far from safe or sane), it ultimately didn't make a lot of sense or tie together in the way that most of King's stories do. It frankly felt like strangeness thrown in for the sake of strange instead of a story that melded well with and allowed for certain oddities.

Despite my critical tone here, once I finished the book I was ultimately glad that I stuck with it. It does have a few minor ties to The Dark Tower universe which I enjoyed picking up on, and Norman Daniels was a terrifying antagonist. He was the sort of villain that one could imagine being a real person, and dwelling on that is scarier than any monster.

So, all this to say, Rose Madder was just all right. It had some good moments and was worth a read for any King completist, but could have been a whole lot shorter and probably stronger for it.

-D.G.

In Writing, Book Reviews Tags stephen king, rose madder, the dark tower, review, the girl who loved tom gordon, blaze, roadwork, bachman, novel, story, book, reading, reading 2015, books 2015, books, horror, melodrama, weird, strange, bull, centaur, maze, labyrinth, author, writer, colorado, denver, doctor gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, THE SHOT, hitching post, pirate ghost of hole 19, white bark, poisonous snakes of the midwest, muzzleland press, rose madder book review, stephen king rose madder, rose madder stephen king, rose madder novel
Comment

"Donnybrook" Book Review - Frank Bill

October 1, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

I came upon Frank Bill's work by way of reading Donald Ray Pollock (who, in turn, I was directed to because Chuck Palahniuk referenced the strength of his work in an interview), and Frank rightfully belongs in such honorable company as those bold and brutal authors. Having read his first book, a collection of short stories titled Crimes in Southern Indiana (which I loved), I bought his debut novel soon after and only recently got around to reading it.

The premise begins as a simple one: there is an annual three-day event called the Donnybrook that takes place in backwoods Indiana where men pay a $1,000 registration fee to fight each other inside a wire fence ring, bare-knuckled, in groups of twenty at once until only one is left standing to go on to the next round. The grand prize? $100k. Onlookers camp all around the thousand acre grounds, betting on the fights, grilling up meat, snorting meth and other narcotics, and drinking copious amounts of hard liquor and cheap beer. The whole event is put on (and the prize money fronted by) an independently wealthy fatcat with a lust for bloodshed named Belmont McGill.

Given the title, the premise, and my familiarity with Frank's first book, I knew I would be in for a gruesome ride with Donnybrook. I wasn't wrong; this book is brutal. There was one particular torture scene involving tiny blades being inserted at pressure points in the body that I found genuinely difficult to continue reading. I was squirming in my seat, literally. Now that's powerful literature.

That said, Frank isn't just writing a slasher book here; he's building a world that is characterized by grittiness and terror, a version of which exists in the backyard of our own country. His writing is a cornucopia of textures and pitch-perfect descriptions. The man is a master of details, laying out scenes, environments, and the physical features of his characters with vivid (often cringe-worthy) accuracy. For the reader, there is no question of the scent of a meth-cooking house, the sound of a sawed-off shotgun being fired indoors, or the taste of blood mixed with gravel.

My only criticism is that the wide cast of characters in Donnybrook are, at times, almost indiscernible from one another. There are several storylines taking place between a few main “protagonists,” carrying along on their own paths until everything culminates at the Donnybrook. While the stories are technically clear and unique in purpose, I found myself getting mixed up with just who was who and why each was doing what because nearly all of them (particularly the men) are equally despicable. The two possibly redeemable figures are a tough but moral sheriff named Whalen and a young man, Jarhead, who is admittedly misled but has pure motives. Other than that, everyone is a wretch, and while this can be fun in the beginning it was at hard times to stick with a novel where everyone is a horrific human being.

That said, this book is still a spectacle to behold and, I must confess, a pretty fun ride front to back. I found myself grinning during numerous passages because, doggone it, there's just nothin' like some good ass-kickin' in the old American backcountry.

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags frank bill, crimes in southern indiana, donnybrook, review, book, novel, reading, books 2015, author, indiana, gritty, southern, backwoods, gruesome, american, bare knuckle, fist fight, meth, cook, trailer park, dusty, blood, shotgun, donald ray pollock, chuck palahniuk, knockemstiff, the devil all the time, denver, colorado, doctor gaines, gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, hitching post, pirate ghost of hole 19, white bark, poisonous snakes of the midwest, the shot, donnybrook novel, donnybrook book review, donnybrook frank bill, frank bill donnybrook
Comment

"Lunar Park" Book Review - Bret Easton Ellis

September 3, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

Bret Easton Ellis ventures into horror, weird and supernatural territory; who knew he had it in him?

The story is that of Bret Ellis, an author whose work made him famous from a very young age, and who has enjoyed a life of extravagance, wealth and relative ease apart from the drama in his private life. The book begins with an exposition of Bret's history (which contains both fact and fiction), beginning with his college days and the hugely successful publishing of Less Than Zero that made him a celebrity almost overnight. The opening chapter goes on to expound Bret's various troubled relationships with men and women, his drug use and partying, his gallivanting around New York and Los Angeles through expensive hotels and restaurants with his author friend Jay McInerney, his book tours for which he was scarcely sober (or coherent) and the repercussions of the terrible relationship he had with his late father.

Fathers and sons is a strong them in the novel. One of the most curious elements (when held up against Bret's actual life) is that he marries a fictional actress (in real life Ellis is gay) of substantial renown who has two children; a girl of seven or eight and a boy of eleven. His relationship with the boy, Robby, is strained from the start. At first, Bret seems disinterested in pursuing either of his step-children but becomes increasingly obsessed with making right with Robby in particular as the story goes on. Meanwhile, he wrestles with anger towards his dead father and the lack of closure they had when he passed.

Much of the weirdness of the book (which builds slowly and is expertly subtle—until it isn't) revolves around Ellis' previous books, as well as his father. For example, a young man named Clay (same name as the main character of Less Than Zero) shows up to Bret's Halloween party dressed as Patrick Bateman (the psychopathic killer from American Psycho). Bret keeps receiving blank emails at exactly 2:40 a.m. from the bank where his father's ashes are kept in a safe deposit box. He keeps seeing a cream colored Mercedes Benz 450 SL—the same car that his father owned and he himself drove as a teenager—parked outside his house or at the college where he teaches. To top it all off, preteen boys have been mysteriously disappearing all around the city... All that only scratches the surface; there's plenty of other weirdness that happens, as well as sections that are downright creepy and wrought with suspense.

What comes as such a surprise (though perhaps it shouldn't) is just how damn good Bret Easton Ellis is at combining a genuinely engaging story of a broken man and his troubled relationships with elements that are absolutely bizarre. Somehow, he makes this combination work. I suppose it is surprising because, apart from one short story that involves a vampire in his collection The Informers, Ellis' work always remains in the realm of the “real.” So to read material of his that would be perfectly suited inside a Stephen King novel is a unique pleasure. 

There is a careful amalgamation going on in this book of factual Bret mixed with fictional Bret melding into an altogether strange central character whose reliability is questionable (not for his narrative dishonesty, but for his paranoia and abuse of drugs and alcohol). Additionally, I loved the meta quality of the novel—a literary gamble, and not an easy technique to pull off well—how it was written to be self-aware, self-referencing, branching outside the norms of a typical narrative and inclusive of Ellis' other works.

Having read all of his other works prior to this one (with the exception of The Rules of Attraction), Lunar Park became my new favorite before I was even halfway through it. I'm a sucker for strange fiction and already enjoyed Ellis' work so I may be biased, but I consider this book a triumph. Not many people can so expertly blend the dramatic with the weird.

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing, Film Tags lunar park, bret easton ellis, american psycho, less than zero, imperial bedrooms, glamorama, the rules of attraction, the informers, christian bale, clay, novel, book, books, reading, review, 2005, 2015, reading 2015, summer reading, writer, author, self aware, self referencing, meta, fame, doctor gaines, gaines, josh gaines, dr gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, movie, film, horror, weird, bizarre, weird lit, literature, weird fiction, muzzleland press, THE SHOT, science fiction, sci fi, hitching post, white bark, pirate ghost of hole 19, poisonous snakes of the midwest, denver, colorado, lunar park book review, lunar park novel, lunar park bret easton ellis
Comment

"The Likeness" Book Review - Tana French - Dublin Murder Squad Book #2

August 24, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

I have mixed feelings about this book. I began reading it immediately after finishing French's stellar debut novel, the award-winning In the Woods (which I raved about here), and while in The Likeness the initial premise is intriguing and a little out of left-field for the genre, it quickly devolved into something tedious and slow.

While In the Woods did take its time and was a “slow-burn” story (for lack of a better term), it was still well told, interesting from start to finish, and read like a detective story with some literary flair. The Likeness reads more like a tense family drama or—sad, but true—something a step or two up from a soap opera. I don't know if this says anything of the book's quality, but I read In the Woods in a week; The Likeness took me nearly a month. I knew I wanted to finish it, but the prospect was not an exciting one. It was hard to want to pick it back up and keep going.

It begins with Cassie Maddox (co-star of In the Woods and one of my favorite characters from that novel) being called to a crime scene even though she had transferred out of Murder six months prior and was working in Domestic Violence at the time. She quickly realizes the reason for the call because the dead body lying on the cold floor of an abandoned cottage is hers—or at least, it looks exactly like her (thus the title). What ensues next is Cassie taking on the identity of the dead young woman in an attempt to track down her killer. This involves Cassie moving in with four college students in Whitethorn House, a dilapidated mansion in Glenskehy and the former home of the dead woman.

Cassie's period living with these students—Daniel, Justin, Rafe, and Abby—takes up the rest of the novel, and it is here where my comparison to a soap opera comes in. While this part of the book is still technically well written with strong characters and decent dialogue, very little of it feels like an investigation, which left me as the reader somewhat bewildered. To go from one book that is very much a detective story into its direct sequel and get a drama with a circumstantial mystery thrown in felt off-kilter somehow.

It probably sounds as if I'm bashing the book so far. Well, I said at the start that I had mixed feelings about this one, and here's why: I cannot say that, overall, it was a bad book, just a weird one. I can say that, even though it took some extra effort, I am glad I finished it, and by the end felt that the experience had actually been a pretty good one. It was just so wholly different than its predecessor that it almost felt like the two did not belong together at all—even though The Likeness intimately intertwines with people and events from In the Woods. The whole doppelganger thing was a bit of a stretch, and even though seeing it play out was somewhat fun, it felt like the author was throwing in a dash of fantasy or sci-fi in an otherwise straight-faced series.

But here's the thing: wacky as the concept was, French made me believe it. At no point did her commitment to the premise falter, and even though this sort of thing probably would not ever happen in real life, she executed every aspect with as much reality as possible, and it held up pretty well.

I see that other reviewers have complained about the book's length and I can't disagree. I mentioned it took me a while to get through this one and that is at least partly why. There is an enormous chunk of the book where Cassie is just hanging out with her college roommates—drinking and smoking a lot, playing games, having picnics, listening to records, fixing up their house—and while this section solidifies the reader's idea of who each of these people are as characters, it simply isn't very interesting to sit through. Breakthroughs in the case come few and far between, and isn't that the main reason we read books like this one?

So, like I said: mixed feelings. The Likeness is not great, but it's also not terrible. It's a strange little book that feels like a distant cousin to In the Woods as opposed to a sister or brother. For folks who liked In the Woods as much as I did, I'd say this one is a toss-up. You might love it, or you might be totally thrown off by it. I'm somewhere in between those two. If you're willing to give the author a little leeway, then there's probably a nugget of enjoyment to be found.

-D.G.

In Writing, Book Reviews Tags tana french, in the woods, the likeness, dublin murder squad, cassie maddox, rob ryan, detective, detective novel, murder, mystery, novel, irish, ireland, book, books 2015, reading 2015, reading, read, author, writer, denver, colorado, doctor gaines, dr gaines, gaines, josh gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, THE SHOT, muzzleland press, hitching post, white bark, pirate ghost of hole 19, poisonous snakes of the midwest, review, murder mystery, the likeness book review, the likeness tana french, tana french dublin murder squad, the likeness novel
Comment

"As I Lay Dying" Book Review - William Faulkner

July 31, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

As I Lay Dying is one of those titles that I had heard thrown around by friends or fellow readers—both in praise and in distaste—for years before ever picking it up for myself. It was required reading for my highschool girlfriend in AP English (which is ironic, because she hated reading, whereas I loved to read, yet I was in “regular” English). I would hear classmates talking about the book and the fact that it was hard to understand and that each chapter was told from a different character's perspective, which intrigued me. At some point James Franco went and made that low-budget adaptation of the novel that, according to the unreliable opinion of the internet, is godawful.

Having been blown away by what is arguably Faulkner's most famous and beloved work, The Sound and the Fury, earlier this year, I took a brief repose into other authors' books before deciding it was time to dive into some Faulkner once again. One has to be in the right mindset to read Faulkner, or at least I do, as his books can be challenging and require utmost attention, thus reading him takes a bit of mental steeling and careful intention. A simple beach-read type of author, he was not, and yet in the case of these two novels, the payoff was well worth the effort put forth. And when things got tough to follow or all the necessary pieces of the puzzle had not yet been given? I learned to just keep going. Faulkner's breadcrumb trails always led to somewhere.

As I Lay Dying has its challenging moments, but overall it is a more straightforward story than Fury. The tale centers around Addie Bundren, a self-righteous and stubborn woman who is oft found wallowing in her own troubles and is on her deathbed at the beginning of the novel. It is her dying wish that her body be transported to Jefferson, Mississippi to be buried with her ancestors. She lies in bed while watching her oldest son work outside the window all day, Cash, who is building by hand the wooden coffin in which Addie will be buried. Addie's teenage daughter, Dewey Dell, stands by her side, fanning her in the heat. The middle son, Jewel, is a cynical bastard, cruel and impatient with the rest of his family, and his only pride in life is in caring for his horse, Snopes. Darl is the most “normal” and articulate of the sons, and narrates more chapters in the book than any other character. Vardaman is the youngest son, an imaginative and curious little boy who observes his older brothers with a sort of quiet fascination. Lastly is Anse, or “Pa,” Bundren, a slack-jawed man who spends his days sitting on the porch and staring into the fields, and who has not lifted a finger to work in twenty years or more due to some ambiguous injury in his younger days. He, like Addie, has his own sense of self-righteousness and stubbornness, although he is completely un-intimidating and the children mostly view him as a bother and a chore.

The main plot consists of Addie's death near the start of the book and the family's troublesome journey to Jefferson to bury her, during which time each character expresses their thoughts on the trip, opinions of their fellow family members and their motives for going along.

Two similarities between Dying and Fury struck me: First is that both tell stories of large families in the South that may have at one time been stable in terms of income, had a level of respect in their communities and perhaps once resembled something like a healthy family unit, but at the time we are introduced to them in the novels they are crumbling into broken, pathetic messes, barely holding on to life and dignity. Irony and tragedy are all over these books, as well as dark humor, and Faulkner's keen sense of the fleetingness of life is on full display. I find it interesting that he explored the dissolution of Southern families in particular (understanding, of course, that he did grow up there, so there were the sort of people with which he was familiar). His books also seem to paint the Christian faith in a mocking, satirical light and expose the errors of greed and pride. Secondly, both books include a character who is mentally unwell. The more obvious of the two is Benjamin Compson in Fury, although Cash's mental instability becomes more and more apparent throughout Dying until the culmination at the end of the book when he literally goes crazy. It is a tragic scene, as is much of the novel, and serves to further express the madness of the whole premise.

The final scene left me shaking my head and muttering phrases of disbelief out loud for several minutes, though that is not to say the ending wasn't quite “good,” at least in terms of being a fitting close to the book. This is quite a novel, and I can see why it is heralded alongside Fury as being one of Faulkner's best. It is also very dark and at times demented, especially considering the time and social climate in which it was written. For some reason, I am glad for having read The Sound and the Fury first, although I am not sure why. Perhaps it gave me a better perspective with which to approach more of his work.

Long story short, Faulkner was a genius, and a master of minimalism and ironic symbolism. Any serious lover of literature is doing themselves a disservice if they have overlooked his work.

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags william faulkner, the sound and the fury, southern gothic, south, southern fiction, deep south, as i lay dying, review, james franco, compson, bundren, addie, coffin, cash, jewel, snopes, vardaman, dewey dell, faulkner, fiction, novel, book, reading, reading 2015, books 2015, summer reading, jefferson, mississippi, author, writer, death, dark, humor, literature, doctor gaines, dr gaines, gaines, josh gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, the shot, hitching post, white bark, pirate ghost of hole 19, denver, colorado, william faulkner best books, william faulkner best book, as i lay dying book review, as i lay dying novel
Comment

"In The Woods" Book Review - Tana French - Dublin Murder Squad Book #1

July 23, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

Every once in awhile you come across a book of such genius that, once you finish the final page and close the volume, leaves you thinking, “Now just how the hell did they come up with that?” In the Woods was that way for me, although I did not recognize that the book was brilliant from the beginning; it snuck up on me.

It was given to me as a wedding gift (in 2010, when it was already three years old) and had always intrigued me, yet sat untouched on my bookshelf for five years. Every time I picked it up, ready for a new book and perusing my shelves for the next thing to read, I would always internally cite that it was “not the right time of life” for that particular book.

As a side note, I have an odd, almost autistic-level obsessive compulsion about choosing what book to read next, insistent that I need to find just the right book that will hit me just the right way and match my mood for that particular period in life. Being between books—existing in that tiny window of savory time, having finished the previous thing and getting to choose the next thing—is too sweet and exciting to approach lightly, at least for me. That, and the fact that I own more than 300 volumes between two eight foot high shelves and have only read perhaps one third of them creates a certain self-inflicted pressure to make some progress through my miniature library (which only grows as life goes on). Too many books, too little time.

I say that the genius of this book snuck up on me because from the beginning I did not necessarily find it riveting or demanding in the hook of its initial premise, and yet it had a soft, quiet, un-put-down-able quality that kept me coming back to take in large portions at a time.

It begins as a “normal” enough murder mystery—horrific though the murder is—with a twelve year old girl found dead on an ancient sacrificial stone in the middle of an archaeological dig in Knocknaree, Ireland. What is revealed very early on is that this story encircles not one mystery but two, the second having happened thirty-some years earlier and directly involving one of the lead investigators on the dead girl's case, Detective Robert Ryan. The story is told from Rob's perspective, and like any good character he is complex, likable yet broken, and at times, unreliable as a narrator. From the very start, he confesses his own unreliability to the reader with the simple line: “I lie.”

The strength of this novel lies in the depth of its characters, and particularly in the relationship between the two protagonists, Det. Ryan and his partner Det. Cassie Maddox. Their partnership and friendship is a unique one, and some of the book's best moments are passages of their dialogue together. While the story is dark and heavy in an overall sense, it is not lacking for humor, diversity, and welcome breaks from the main plot. There are a number of offshoots and explored leads in the investigation that help spice up the narrative and keep the reader guessing—along with the detectives—which paths will be fruitful and which are dead ends. And while this has been clunkily grouped into the “Mystery” genre (which, admittedly, it is), it is also much more than your simple beach-read thriller, and literary to the core in all the best ways. The aspect of Det. Ryan's background and the demons that haunt him into adulthood is a piece of the novel that is expertly explored, as is the thread of his relationship with Cassie and how it evolves throughout the story. No wonder the book won a number of awards.

Tana French has an incredible sensibility for how humans think, act, and speak. Her dialogue is spot on (nothing is better than reading a book where characters talk the way real people talk), her characters diverse and vibrant, and her ability to craft a complex story impeccable. There were several moments that had me gasping (or moaning) out loud, as I was so invested in these characters and ached at the trials they had to endure. Cassie Maddox quickly became one of my favorite characters I have ever encountered in literature, and I don't use that superlative lightly. Thank goodness she appears in at least one more of French's subsequent novels. It is rare for me to finish a book and be left wanting to spend more time with the characters, but that was absolutely the case here.

I read a lot of books, though not many mysteries, and this one simply blew me away. For all intents and purposes, it is in my mind a “perfect” story; the sort of thing you walk away from thrilled about and perturbed at the same time that you didn't think of it first. This is the sort of writing to which I aspire.

If it isn't already clear: I cannot recommend this book highly enough.

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags tana french, in the woods, the likeness, faithful place, the secret place, broken harbor, broken harbour, author, writer, review, ireland, irish, mystery, thriller, books 2015, reading 2015, novel, edgar award, award winning, debut, cassie maddox, rob ryan, adam ryan, detective, gone girl, dark, moody, dark fiction, twisted, demented, american, doctor gaines, dr gaines, gaines, josh gaines, denver, colorado, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, hitching post, white bark, pirate ghost of hole 19, muzzleland press, THE SHOT, in the woods book review, in the woods tana french, tana french first book, tana french in the woods review, dublin murder squad, tana french dublin murder squad, dublin murder squad book 1, in the woods novel review
Comment

"The Jaws Log" Book Review - Carl Gottlieb - The Making of JAWS (1975), a diary from the set of the hit movie

July 8, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

For the hardcore Jaws fan, this is fun and certainly worth a read. However, after finishing this I watched the two hour documentary featured on the Jaws BluRay and essentially most of the same stories surrounding the production are told there as well, and more colorfully.

Gottlieb is an okay writer, but he tends to go off on small tangents throughout the book that are not directly relevant to the making of Jaws. Granted, he wasn't shooting for some grand literary feat with this small volume, and basically the book consists of nothing more than collected stories and interviews from before, during, and after production. The whole book has a somewhat cutesy, lighthearted quality, full of all the fish, bite, and water puns one might expect. Part of this, I suppose, is a product of it being a book from 1975; there is a playful tongue-in-cheek vibe about it, reminiscent of “simpler” times.

Reading this gave me a whole new appreciation for Jaws as a film (even with it already being one of my favorites) because the making of it was truly a disaster. One key reason for this is that filming a giant mechanical shark that was painstakingly made to look real had simply never been done before. Pair that with Spielberg's perfectionist approach and the fact that they filmed 12 miles from shore in order to appear being far out into the sea, and you've got a perfect storm of things that can go wrong—and they did. Admittedly, a book could probably be written about the making of nearly any major budget movie and the slew of obstacles that come up during production of a film, but what makes the story of Jaws remarkable is that somehow Spielberg and his editor, an industry veteran named Verna Fields, were able to scrounge together reels and reels of footage from a disastrous shoot and turn it into one of the most beloved films of all time.

There were a few things mentioned that would certainly not fly by today's standards. For example, the crew members were actively killing sharks for sport in between shots while out on the water. The author mentions this with an air that communicates he actually found it humorous, and says that it was the crew's way of taking revenge on the fact that they were miserable, homesick, and far over schedule. Not cool. Additionally, there were passing comments about crew members drinking beer throughout the shooting days. I'm fairly certain that alcohol is strictly off-limits on set these days, at least for crew (the talent may be another story).

Anyhow, I came away from this with a greater fondness for Spielberg and the passion with which he approaches his work (plus the fact that he was twenty-seven when he finished this film; my current age, by the way). On the contrary, my perception of a few of the film's stars was tarnished, but not greatly. They're actors, they live in their own world and sometimes they're divas, and there is nothing we lowly common folk can do about it.

Film buffs or avid fans of the movie will probably enjoy this. It was a quick and entertaining read with some interesting behind the scenes stories.

-D.G.

In Film, Writing, Book Reviews Tags jaws, the jaws log, steven spielberg, spielberg, carl gottlieb, jaws log, movie, script, shooting, peter benchley, benchley, actor, robert shaw, quint, speech, richard dreyfuss, roy scheider, matt hooper, ocean, biologist, shark, bite, week, review, book, novel, volume, paperback, classic, 1975, film, great white, teeth, bitefish, you're gonna need a bigger boat, blood, sfx, the shot, doctor gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, gaines, author, denver, colorado, writer, reading 2015, books 2015, summer reading, beach, water, martha's vineyard, production, set, michigan ten cents, claras quilt, hitching post, white bark, pirate ghost of hole 19, carl gottlieb the jaws log, the jaws log carl gottlieb, the jaws log book, the jaws log book review, the making of jaws, jaws 1975, carl gottlieb book review, the jaws diary
Comment

"Finders Keepers" by Stephen King - Book Review - Mr. Mercedes Trilogy

June 18, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

Before noting a couple of negatives about this book, I will declare first that overall I enjoyed it—quite a lot, actually, and perhaps even more than Mr. Mercedes. However, it was not without its issues.

I do not know whether I am becoming more attentive to (and critical of) plot patterns as I get older and mature as a reader, or whether Stephen King is merely simplifying his narratives as he gets older, but this book had some happenstances that were just a little too convenient to be believable (yes, even barring the suspension of disbelief that ought to be employed when reading King). What bothers me is when a character and their story are established as a stand-alone entity (I'm talking about Morris Bellamy in this case), but then are plugged into a preexisting plot in such a way that everything falls into place a little too perfectly. Somehow it feels like lazy writing, or like combining two things that don't necessarily belong, but shaping the narrative in such a way that forces them to belong. Perhaps that is always the nature of sequels to some degree, but it was prominent enough in Finders Keepers to be a tad irksome. I do not expect that all readers will notice (or be bothered by) this angle.

Stephen King does seem to be parring down the length of his books in the past few years (I'm thinking of Revival, Mr. Mercedes, and Doctor Sleep, primarily), allowing stories to glide forward at a steady pace rather than let them breathe and grow incrementally. IT, Insomnia, 11/22/63, Pet Sematary, and Under the Dome, to name a few, took their time allowing the reader to “hang out” with the characters for a while in situations that were at times inconsequential but almost always enriching to the story overall because they brought those people to life. This is not necessarily a criticism, King is still churning out exciting and original work in his mid-sixties, after all, but I have taken note over the past few releases that this quicker pace has become somewhat of a pattern.

That said, the first two-thirds of Finders Keepers were riveting (as was the third, in a different way). I consumed this book in just a few lengthy reading sessions and couldn't help but think the whole time that it could have easily been its own stand-alone book, disconnected from the Detective Bill Hodges trilogy that began with Mr. Mercedes. However, there was a sensation of inner glee once Hodges does make his first appearance in the book, a bangin' scene that reintroduces the man at the top of his P.I. game, reminding me of who this character is and why I loved him in the first book. Holly and Jerome return as well, of course, completing the trio of investigating misfits who happen to have an off-kilter talent for sleuthing.

What is rather odd about Finders Keepers is that Hodges, Jerome, and Holly are almost the most insignificant element of the story, even though their characters are what spawned this sequel in the first place. They do have some key involvement towards the end of the book, and the quirkiness of the three of them interacting together makes their presence enjoyable no matter what, but the main bulk of the novel focuses on the madman Morris Bellamy, a boy named Pete Saubers, and the fictional author John Rothstein, whose work ties their fates together in a complicated fashion. As I mentioned, the entire book could have been about Bellamy and Saubers, and would have been no less engaging for it.

Book lovers in particular will find a little something extra to enjoy about this plot, as it deals heavily with literature, its value, and the profound affect a book or series can have on a passionate reader.

In all, this is essentially what one might expect from a sequel to Mr. Mercedes, but that is not to say it wasn't a fun read with enjoyable faces both new and familiar. I will say that the ending particularly delighted me, and for obvious reasons I won't mention why here. Let's just say that book three of the Hodges trilogy ought to get pretty damn exciting.

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags stephen king, finders keepers, mr mercedes, review, brady hartsfield, morris bellamy, villain, protagonist, antagonist, pete saubers, tina, detective, hodges, bill hodges, holly, jerome, tyrone feelgood delight, the stand, it, insomnia, 11/22/63, pet sematary, the shining, john rothstein, john updike, novel, books, books 2015, reading, reading 2015, writing, notebooks, journal, moleskine, writer, doctor gaines, gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, the shot, hitching post, pirate ghost of hole 19, muzzleland press, author, denver, colorado, fiction, trilogy, poisonous snakes of the midwest, white bark, horror, thriller, private detective, detective novel, finders keepers stephen king review, mr mercedes book two, mr mercedes trilogy, bill hodges trilogy, mr mercedes 2, who wrote mr mercedes, finders keepers book review, mr mercedes book review, mr mercedes review, stephen king best books, stephen king best book, stephen king book review
Comment

"The Martian" Andy Weir - Book Review

May 27, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

Plenty well enough has been said about this story (and its pending film) already. By the time I received the book for Christmas in 2014 (at which time I had never heard of it), it was already quite a phenomenon. With that in mind, here are a few thoughts anyway.

First of all, the publishing history of how this book came to be in its current form is an interesting story itself. This can be heard firsthand by Andy Weir over at the Inquiring Minds podcast—great interview, too. I must confess, I love to hear these “success stories” from indie authors who simply write something because it brings them joy, then they gain an online following that they weren't even trying for, then end up releasing something to universal acclaim. Hugh Howey comes to mind.

As to the quality of the writing in The Martian, it leaves a bit to be desired. Without meaning to sound condescending, it reads exactly like it what it is: a fictional narrative written by an engineer who could out-quiz the lot of us under the table. It is clunky in places, corny in even more places, and much of the character dialogue consists of typical, familiar tropes. Despite these things, Weir manages to pull off what is ultimately a well-paced and -developed plot, even if his phrasing is nothing original and his characters are fairly cookie-cutter apart from Mark Watney himself.

Watney is, for the most part, an enjoyable character (if corny at times), and I think he probably had to be a fun character for all the lengthy passages of oration detailing mathematical and scientific processes. Were he flat, many readers would probably give up by Page 20. Reviewers have praised the humor in this book, although to my ear it came off as eye-rollingly bad in places, chock-full of the worst pun-fodder your dad could ever come up with. But at least the author was breaking up the monotony that could have come from so many explanatory sections describing Watney's many survival tasks. Also, it will be interesting to see how much of the humor makes it into Ridley Scott's film, as Matt Damon may be just the actor who can pull off the sort of deadpan delivery to make such cheesy lines believable.

I found the most intriguing part of the book to be the lengthy descriptions of Mark's farming, repairing the HAB, regenerating water for himself, and all the hundreds of other things he must do to survive on Mars. From reading other reviews, I believe I am in the majority with this opinion. To the layman (referring to myself here), there is something so utterly foreign and fascinating about these space and physics concepts that Watney encounters, and it is even more mind-blowing to recognize that there are thousands of people working on these very things every day. The mark of Weir's writing talent comes through in that he was able to explain extremely complicated processes in such a straightforward, easy-to-follow way. And, goodness sakes, do some of them sound exhausting. There is a reason only a select few out of billions were ever destined to become astronauts.

In all, The Martian was an enjoyable read, even if it is not necessarily great literature (and granted, it has never claimed to be). What you'll get is a fast-moving space thriller surrounding a nugget of scientific research that is entertaining and—so the experts say—pretty close to accurate (or as close to it as Weir could get).

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing, Film Tags the martian, andy weir, weir, martian, matt damon, film, movie, photos, details, mars, red planet, ridley scott, blade runner, alien, aliens, mark watney, watney, red, space, outer space, space exploration, mcguyver, duct tape, thriller, sci fi, science fiction, THE SHOT, hitching post, pirate ghost of hole 19, muzzleland press, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, doctor gaines, gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, author, writer, denver, colorado, blog, reading 2015, reading, books 2015, review, who wrote the martian, the martian author, the martian writer, the martian andy weir, the martian book review, the martian andy weir book, andy weir books, the martian matt damon, the martian ridley scott
Comment

Flight of the Blue Falcon - Jonathan Raab

May 11, 2015 Josh Gaines

Flight of the Blue Falcon will be released July 1, 2015 through The War Writer's Campaign. Pre-order it now from Amazon.com at this link.

I am not the sort of person who would normally read a novel about war, the army, American politics, etc. Those things do not interest me, nor have I ever cared to know much about them. However, this book is, at its heart, about none of those things—not really—but rather about people (three men, to be precise) in the midst of absurd, yet nonetheless true circumstances going on in our modern day military.

The author is a friend, and there is inevitably a loaded quality that goes along with reading a friend's work. There is a desire to view the book objectively and be fair, but be honest at the same time. This book has its issues and probably could have been shortened a good deal, but still I found myself getting lost in the experiences of the characters and the intimate individual moments of certain chapters. At times, the quality of Raab's writing took over and suddenly it was as if I was right there in the dust next to Private Rench, Staff Sergeant Halderman, and Second Lieutenant Gracie. He has a talent both for environmental detail and the occasional straight to the heart sort of honesty about the human experience that often took me by surprise.

Flight of the Blue Falcon has an overarching thread, but is structured in an episodic manner, jumping between the three main characters' perspectives, and each chapter serving almost as its own stand-alone slice of life. This works both to the book's favor and sometimes to its detriment. While some chapters are fascinating for the unbelievable events they describe or interesting because of the depth of their human emotional charge, others tend to drag. That said, there were more than a few that left me dumbfounded and authentically moved. This book has both comedy and tragedy, and often those polar qualities are interwoven with each other.

Perhaps the most intriguing thing about this novel is the account of the war experience itself. As the rear cover of the book boldly states, “WAR IS STUPID,” and as this story shows us, it most certainly is. What is most impressive about this theme is the way Raab is able to present it with a completely apolitical stance. Flight of the Blue Falcon is neither preachy nor shoving the values of one political party in our faces under the false guise of “Literature,” it is merely presenting to the reader what really goes on (from the author's firsthand experience, by the way).

There were things in this book that shocked me and made me shake my head, both in disgust and in despair. And it is these mindless, insane, don't-ask-just-do-it circumstances through which the three protagonists of the novel must trudge. They are angry, confused, floating along through the hot, dusty days, often with uncertain purpose for why they are there at all. They are soldiers, and yet even more-so, they are just regular guys, doing what any of us would do in their boots: try to keep it together for another day.

I imagine that those who have served our military may find this book especially enjoyable; cathartic, in a way, and oddly comforting. Raab calls out the B.S. of the current military system, a broken machine that countless Americans have no doubt endured. The reader comes out the other end feeling chewed-up, spit out, and disoriented right along with the main characters, unsure of what they just did or whether it had any real purpose, yet also somehow glad for having made the journey.

Flight of the Blue Falcon is set to release July 1, 2015 through The War Writer's Campaign. Pre-order it now from Amazon at this link.

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags jonathan raab, muzzleland press, war writers campaign, flight of the blue falcon, novel, war, army, military, veteran, raab, author, denver, colorado, gaines, doctor gaines, dr gaines
Comment

"The Sound and the Fury" William Faulkner - Book Review

April 27, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

I had been meaning to read this book for ten years, and it took me three tries to finally do so.

My first attempt was in early high school around age sixteen—by choice, not as an AP English class requirement as some probably had it forced upon them—and while at the time I found the first section (Benjy's narrative) to be riveting and beautiful, I was probably too young and immature to appreciate the notoriously challenging second section which involves Quentin's stream-of-consciousness college experience. I got burnt out on this section and moved on.

The second time around was roughly a year ago, only a few days after my daughter was born—NEWSFLASH: wrong time to read a novel that requires significant focus. Again, loved the first part, became overwhelmed by section two.

A few weeks back—older, (maybe) wiser, and equipped with some meager level of higher reading comprehension—I picked it up again and found myself captivated, flying through it. There are not many books to which I would give three chances. One shot, maybe two, is normally sufficient for me to know if I'm going to like something or not. Granted, in this case the issue was not a question of the book being good or bad, but me not being in the right time of life and mindset to handle it well. And that first section kept me coming back. If you've not read the book, it's really something special.

At its heart, The Sound and the Fury is the story of people; some of them despicable, some of them tragic and painfully sad, but all of them vividly real. The only other author I have read whose characters seem to have actual heartbeats is John Steinbeck, and of course he and Faulkner both made the process of writing authentic humans seem effortless. The dialogue comes easy and often seems irrelevant (though rarely is when it comes to Faulkner), but the beauty is in the way it rolls along in the natural and imperfect way that we actually speak.

Faulkner was writing in an era when use of the N-word was rampant (used mostly by the more wretched White characters in this case and framed in a clearly negative, derogatory context) and he frequently uses phonetics in his characters' dialogue, but from this perspective, roughly 85 years since it was published, these elements give a richer and perhaps more accurate presentation of the time, terrible and racist though it was. He writes the 1910's and 20's of the South with all its yellow dusty grit and shabbiness while keeping the sad and depraved attitudes of men of the era on display.

The story of the decline of the once-prosperous Compson family is told through four main voices (and perhaps a few others that sneak in from time to time); Benjamin, or Benjy, the mentally disabled man who is the youngest of the four Compson siblings; Quentin, the tortured and melancholy second-oldest attending Harvard; Jason Compson III—an absolute bastard—the oldest male and inheritor or his dead father's household; and Dilsey, the aging black female servant to the Compsons who also raised the children.

The narrative jumps between a number of different unspecified timelines, often with no warning except that some of these switches are in italic font. Each of the four main narrators can be unreliable, as they are presenting certain events from their own perspective and (possibly skewed) memory. Bits and pieces of others' dialogue cut in, sometimes dropping the reader in the middle of a sentence, and it is not always immediately clear who is speaking, or to whom. I personally found that the best method for reading this novel was to not get too caught up in trying to figure out what was what or keep it all in my head from these convoluted passages, but simply to keep moving forward and eventually context or further revealed information brings clarity to what is happening on the whole. This process is fascinating and infuriating at once, but I must say it makes for a unique reading experience.

This book is brimming with wordplay, double meanings, and irony, and I guarantee I only picked up on a small fraction of all that is probably there to be found. Faulkner's mastery as an author is on full display, and it is a wonder how a person could write a novel of this scope and complication without getting twisted up in their mind and going crazy. But again, it isn't worth reading just because it is a unique literary challenge, the strength of the novel is clearest in the realness of the characters.

This is already a modern classic, so you should hardly need my recommendation. There is incredible value and insight to be taken from some of these "older" books. So take the time, make the effort, read some Faulkner. I think you'll come out the other end enlightened.

-D.G.

In Writing, Book Reviews Tags william faulkner, faulkner, southern gothic, southern fiction, as i lay dying, flannery oconnor, go down moses, james franco, benjy, benjamin, dilsey, south, deep south, dust, grit, gothic, literature, literary, challenging, books 2015, reading 2015, sanctuary, light in august, the hamlet, absalom, absalom absalom, compson, james compson, quentin, novel, book, classic, modern classic, doctor gaines, gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, author, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, the shot, hitching post, pirate ghost of hole 19, muzzleland press, spooklights, high strange horror, william faulkner best books, william faulkner best book, william faulkner the sound and the fury, the sound and the fury william faulkner, the sound and the fury
Comment

"Gateways to Abomination" Matthew M. Bartlett - Book Review

March 18, 2015 Josh Gaines

"If it bleeds, it's Leeds."

These days, it's tough to be scary.

We as a culture have become largely desensitized to horror in every form. We've seen the human body creatively mutilated in every possible which-way, witnessed the exorcisms of so many fictional females we can't even keep their names straight anymore, and watched enough knife or chainsaw wielding psychopaths plunge their instruments into flesh to last us a lifetime. Each of these elements of horror (and many others) can certainly be executed well (heh heh), but how many of these movies or books are just a cheap scare, and how many of them are sticking with us for good? How many of them are keeping us up at night, worried about what might make its way through the darkened door of our bedroom? When was the last time you watched or read something that really shook you up?

For me, the answers to these questions would be Matthew M. Bartlett's bizarre collection of loosely-connected flash fiction and short stories, Gateways to Abomination. Never have I encountered so many completely insane ideas in one volume. Bartlett is a madman, and to the benefit of his readers.

It is difficult to articulate exactly what is so captivating about this collection. The stories are brief and written in a minimalist style. They serve more like snapshots of crazy happenings in individuals' lives than drawn out stories with developed characters, though that is not to say any of them feel lazily-crafted or incomplete. Quite the opposite. Every sentence feels intentional and tight.

Bartlett's vocabulary is grisly and consistent in tone, as if each descriptive word was chosen for the express purpose of making the reader as uncomfortable as possible. What struck me was that as gruesome and disturbing as some of the scenes in this book are, they do not feel like cheap-shots for the biggest gross-out; this is not splatterpunk by any means. The scenarios Bartlett comes up with make one feel as if they are getting a peek behind the curtain of the universe, and what is to be found there is nearly enough to break the mind.

As I mentioned, the stories are loosely connected in a thematic sense. They all exist within the same universe (in fact, the same city), characters and locations will show up in numerous stories, and what is the deal with this Ben Stockton fellow? Read it and you'll know what I mean. Between the stories, Uncle Red read's 'To-Day's News,' describing horrific and impossible happenings around the local area. Intermixed into the stories are bizarre radio broadcasts, always from WXXT, coming to you from Leeds, Massachusetts.

While the whole collection is worth reading (though maybe only one or two in a sitting; wouldn't want to lose your mind, after all), the stories that really got my goat were Pharaoh, When I Was A Boy—A Broadcast, The House in the Woods, The Theories of Uncle Jeb, The Leech, and The Arrival Parts I & II.

If you're a fan of horror in any form, do yourself a favor and buy this already. Walk into the woods. Follow the dark figure. Turn up your radio.

-D.G.

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags matthew m bartlett, gateways to abomination, occult, fiction, horror, terror, bizarre, weird fiction, goat, satanic, woods, leech, witch, witchcraft, leeds, Massachusetts, bartlett, muzzleland press, broadcast, pirate radio, author, writer, reading 2015, books 2015, jonathan raab, doctor gaines, claras quilt, dr gaines, gaines, josh gaines, the shot, michigan ten cents, hitching post, pirate ghost of hole 19, spooklights, high strange horror
Comment

"Live and Let Die" Ian Fleming - Book Review - James Bond Book 2

March 16, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

Several months back, my grandfather gave me his (almost complete) collection of tattered James Bond Signet paperbacks, printed in the 1970's (with fantastic cover art illustrations, by the way). At the time he mentioned that he had read them all numerous times over the years (and the books show their wear for having been read so many times, but in a good way), and that he thought I might enjoy them as well. I believe the only volume missing is Casino Royale, and I have a hunch this one still exists somewhere in my grandparents' attic. I'll be sure to hunt for it next time I'm there.

Until now, I had not read any of them—they became victims of my ever-growing “meaning-to-read-this” library made up of so many untouched volumes currently on my bookshelf—but recently felt in the mood to dive in. Live and Let Die is one of my favorite Bond films and is chronologically the second book in the series after Casino Royale, so it seemed a logical place to begin.

While the film is set in New Orleans and the book in Harlem, they share a common thread of Voodoo folklore. Like the film, there seems to be an indication that the supernatural elements are real, at least in Bond's universe (though these elements are not so brutishly upfront as in the film). Mr. Big is believed by many to actually be a zombie, and for that reason impossible to kill (not in our modern day Walking Dead way of thinking of the term, but the older, much creepier definition in which a zombie is actually the resurrected spirit of Baron Samedi of voodoo lore). Additionally, Solitaire—the mysterious fortune-telling virgin who 'has no interest in any man' (except Bond, of course)—is written as if her telekinetic powers are real. This surprised me, as I had previously been under the impression that the Bond novels “played it straight,” in the sense that they were written in such a way that remained within the realm of the “real,” not stretching into supernatural or spiritual territory.

I will not take the route of endlessly comparing the many differences between the book and the film (as that has surely been done many times over by Bond enthusiasts finer than I), but I will say that I was struck by just how scarce the book was as far as action or activity, though that is not to say I mean boring. Still, in terms of a book considered to be a Thriller (by the publishers at the time, according to its book jacket), not a lot happens. Front to back, Bond gets his mission from M, investigates, experiences a few exciting altercations with Mr. Big or his henchmen, then comes the big finish where Bond gets the badguy (though not without significant help in this case). Otherwise, Bond spends a decent amount of time waiting around in hotel rooms, bars, or restaurants. There is excessive use of the word “luxuriously,” and specific detail is given to many of the meals Bond consumes. But the easy, leisurely pace was endearing rather than dull.

I enjoyed the relationship between Bond and his American partner for this mission, CIA agent Felix Leiter. Ian Fleming is unblushingly condescending in his writing of American characters, but Felix is an exception to this. Leiter is a charming fellow, if overzealous at times.

Speaking of charming, that is probably the best adjective to describe Bond himself. Throughout the book, he is immensely cool in both mannerism and speech. However, it was also refreshing to see a range of Bond's emotions and a level of his vulnerability. James Bond of Fleming's books (or of this one, as it is my only reference thus far) is not the nearly-invincible figure of many of the earlier films. 007 gets nervous and sweaty in tricky situations; he gets scared; he gets injured significantly; he would have been dead at the end of the book without the timely help of Felix Leiter's crew. All that to say, Fleming's Bond is a talented hero, but he is also just a man, and subject to all the limitations therein.

Fleming's writing style is sharp and intelligent, but easy to read. His pacing is excellent, and the book was exciting and fun from start to finish. Also, I might add, quite scandalous at times without being vulgar. It is amazing how “steamy” a passage can be when none of the words being used are obscene.

I had a great time with this one, and am now keen to dive into the rest of the 007 novels. I would highly recommend it to any reader who already enjoys the Bond film franchise but has not yet taken the time to try the books. Even being published 50+ years ago, this is just as smart and entertaining as any contemporary spy thriller.

-D.G.

Tags james bond, 007, live and let die, casino royale, goldeneye, pierce brosnan, sean connery, ian fleming, fleming, bond, spy, thriller, lee child, contemporary, classic, war novel, mr big, gold, daniel craig, roger moore, harlem, voodoo, witchcraft, deep south, tee hee, tux, tuxedo, solitaire, bond girl, reading 2015, books 2015, 2015, franchise, author, writer, read, doctor gaines, dr gaines, josh gaines, gaines, claras quilt, michigan ten cents, the shot, hitching post, pirate ghost of hole 19, muzzleland press, who wrote james bond, ian fleming live and let die, live and let die book, live and let die novel, live and let die book review, james bond book review, best james bond books, best 007 books, best ian fleming books
Comment

"Revival" Stephen King - Book Review

March 13, 2015 Josh Gaines

This post includes affiliate links that support independent bookstores (instead of Amazon!), from which I make a small commission.

Revival is the life-spanning story of Jamie Morton and his “fifth business,” Pastor Charles Jacobs (who goes by a number of names throughout the book). The story opens with Jamie as a six year old boy, and closes with him in his late fifties. Pastor Jacobs is a friendly, vibrant young man with a passionate interest in all things electricity who is newly-hired as a preacher in Jamie's small town. While their first interactions are pleasant—even profound—Jamie and Charles run into each other a number of other times (and under vastly different circumstances) throughout the book.

I had some trouble getting interested in this book until roughly 100 pages in when Jamie's music career begins. The childhood portion of his story is in many ways sweet, but feels a bit rushed on the character development. In fact, I would say that this book had a rushed feel about it overall, at least rushed by King's usual standards, as he is so known for lengthy (and excellent) character development in earlier works. Scenes and people breeze past in Revival before the reader gets much of a chance to get a solid feel for them, and something about it feels underdeveloped.

(Mild plot spoilers from this point on:) The strongest section of the book by far is the middle third when Jamie Morton becomes interested in playing guitar, picking up his brother's dusty ax on a whim and finding he is more or less a natural. Once he begins playing with various bands in high school and beyond, there are some great passages lusciously describing the experience of performing live music and all that goes with it: shaky nerves, the thrill of applause, impressing cute girls in the crowd, etc. Jamie primarily plays in cover bands, and King goes to the trouble to mention quite a few specific bands and songs from the fifties and sixties (some nostalgia on his part, no doubt) that they perform, which only adds to the liveliness of these passages. To top this all off, Jamie develops a serious drug problem which makes for a more enthralling read.

The section following Jamie's music career (but before the big climax) is only mildly interesting. Jamie is growing older and acquires a job at a recording studio/ranch in Nederland, Colorado. Jacobs is now a traveling tent revival preacher with nationwide hype. He travels from city to city and apparently “heals” people with his secret and powerful electricity inventions. There are some fun moments here (like the over-the-top charismatic religious language), but the healing reverend concept feels like something we've seen before.

(SEVERE spoilers, this paragraph only:) Some King readers have taken issue with the big finish to Revival, as it was perceived by many to be a rather random left-turn. The idea of a secret, terrifying “behind-the-curtain” world of damnation and slavery for all mankind at the hands (claws?) of ant-like beasts accessed by means of Jacobs' “secret electricity” seemed to some like a bit of a stretch. I admit, there are hardly any indications earlier in the book that it is leading anywhere remotely supernatural (which, granted, preserves the element of surprise), other than the indication that the electrical force Jacobs has tapped into may have some spiritual or otherworldly origins. The ending reminded me somewhat of the ending to Under the Dome, if only for its completely unexpected turn and inexplicable, there-are-things-bigger-than-us-in-the-universe quality. There is also a definite nod to the works and universe of H.P. Lovecraft (of whom King has been a lifelong fan), specifically the mention towards the end of “The Great Ones.”

Personally, I liked the ending, zany though it was. I'm always up for a batshit crazy conclusion. However, this ending almost feels like a random weird conclusion just for the sake of weirdness. The book builds and builds, but it is almost as if King didn't know how to end it in a logical way, so he threw in some Crazy. That's an unfair criticism, I confess. Maybe King had this particular ending in mind the whole time, and the book is simply imbalanced. But again, that is not to say it is, on the whole, bad.

Still, anyone claiming that Revival is 'KING'S TRIUMPHANT RETURN TO TRUE HORROR, WITH THE CLASSIC QUALITY OF HIS EARLIER WORKS!' is just a yes-man or -woman who is going to put five stars on anything the man puts out.

Revival isn't great, but neither is it crap. In my view, a middling King book is still at the same level of quality as a very good book from any other writer. The man is a genius, but even the masters write a dud here and there.

-D.G.

P.S. I did catch a few minor links to The Dark Tower series. There are several mentions of a red race car stenciled on the side with the number 19. Also, I believe the band name Jamie plays with for the longest amount of time, "Chrome Roses," is also a passing reference to TDK universe. 

In Book Reviews, Writing Tags stephen king, revival, mr mercedes, classic, horror, novel, fiction, writing, reading, read, books 2015, books, reading 2015, jamie morton, pastor charles danny jacobs, skytop, goat mountain, thriller, rock n roll, music, chrome roses, master, masterpiece, genius, hp lovecraft, lovecraft, the old ones, the great ones, bizarre, strange, weird, ending, revival ending, spoiler, doctor gaines, doctor sleep, joyland, the dark tower, roland, gilead, stephen king best book, stephen king book review, stephen king best books, revival stephen king, stephen king revival, revival book review, stephen king revival review, revival stephen king book review
1 Comment
← Newer Posts Older Posts →

Josh is a multi-faceted artist in Portland. On this blog you’ll find his book reviews, new art pieces, videos and the occasional essay.

Patreon
Contact
My Booklist: Favorite Fiction
My Booklist: Favorite Magick and Meditation books
More Reviews
Screen Shot 2022-02-09 at 12.18.37 PM.png
Feb 10, 2022
"We Live Amongst the Dust" by author Matthew D. Jordan, a Weird West trilogy of books
Feb 10, 2022
Feb 10, 2022
lamed four roses.png
Jan 31, 2022
The "Sacred Tongues" Series - Animated NFT Artworks based upon the Hebrew Alphabet
Jan 31, 2022
Jan 31, 2022
IMG_2661.jpg
Nov 12, 2021
ART AS RITUAL - Magick sigils in art: A painting in tribute to the Divine Mother, the sacred feminine & the planet venus
Nov 12, 2021
Nov 12, 2021
Nov 8, 2021
Who Created God? Is God Real? All Deities from Any Religion Represents This ONE Thing
Nov 8, 2021
Nov 8, 2021
Nov 4, 2021
What is a Demon? Should you work with Goetic Spirits in Magick?
Nov 4, 2021
Nov 4, 2021
Nov 1, 2021
Zeit Heist Episode 3: Micki Pellerano -- NYC Artist, Astrologer, Ceremonial Magickian
Nov 1, 2021
Nov 1, 2021
Aug 12, 2021
Zeit Heist Episode 2: Cliff of Enochian.Today on John Dee and Edward Kelley, Liber Loagaeth, Gebofal Working, Scrying Aethyrs, Performing a Jupiter Working, Astrological Timing for Ritual
Aug 12, 2021
Aug 12, 2021
Aug 2, 2021
Zeit Heist Episode 1: Goetic Magic, Demon Ritual, Magick, Thelema, Freemasons, OTO, Golden Dawn, Deities, Angels, Kundalini & More
Aug 2, 2021
Aug 2, 2021
273772_patreon-png.png
Jun 24, 2021
Texture Podcast Episode 24: All You Need is AUM (OM) - Eastern Meditative Practices, Ceremonial Magick, & Being Post-Christian
Jun 24, 2021
Jun 24, 2021
Jun 15, 2021
Stevie Wonder "Love's in Need of Love Today" - Songs in the Key of Life Album 1976 - Karaoke Cover Song
Jun 15, 2021
Jun 15, 2021

Powered by Squarespace